Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Do patients have a say? A narrative review of the development of patient-reported outcome measures used in elective procedures for coronary revascularisation

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Peeters, G.
    Barker, A.
    Talevski, J.
    Ackerman, I.
    Ayton, D.
    Reid, Christopher
    Evans, S.
    Stoelwinder, J.
    McNeil, J.
    Date
    2018
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Peeters, G. and Barker, A. and Talevski, J. and Ackerman, I. and Ayton, D. and Reid, C. and Evans, S. et al. 2018. Do patients have a say? A narrative review of the development of patient-reported outcome measures used in elective procedures for coronary revascularisation. Quality of Life Research: pp. 1-12.
    Source Title
    Quality of Life Research
    DOI
    10.1007/s11136-018-1795-6
    ISSN
    0962-9343
    School
    School of Public Health
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65635
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    © 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture health information from the patient’s perspective that can be used when weighing up benefits, risks and costs of treatment. This is important for elective procedures such as those for coronary revascularisation. Patients should be involved in the development of PROMs to accurately capture outcomes that are important for the patient. The aims of this review are to identify if patients were involved in the development of cardiovascular-specific PROMs used for assessing outcomes from elective coronary revascularisation, and to explore what methods were used to capture patient perspectives. Methods: PROMs for evaluating outcomes from elective coronary revascularisation were identified from a previous review and an updated systematic search. The studies describing the development of the PROMs were reviewed for information on patient input in their conceptual and/or item development. Results: 24 PROMs were identified from a previous review and three additional PROMs were identified from the updated search. Full texts were obtained for 26 of the 27 PROMs. The 26 studies (11 multidimensional, 15 unidimensional) were reviewed. Only nine studies reported developing PROMs using patient input. For eight PROMs, the inclusion of patient input could not be judged due to insufficient information in the full text. Conclusions: Only nine of the 26 reviewed PROMs used in elective coronary revascularisation reported involving patients in their conceptual and/or item development, while patient input was unclear for eight PROMs. These findings suggest that the patient’s perspective is often overlooked or poorly described in the development of PROMs.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Development of a percutaneous coronary intervention patient level composite measure for a clinical quality registry
      Ayton, D.; Soh, S.E.; Morello, R.; Ahern, S.; Earnest, A.; Brennan, A.; Lefkovits, J.; Evans, S.; Reid, Christopher ; Ruseckaite, R.; McNeil, J. (2020)
      © 2020 The Author(s). Background: Composite measures combine data to provide a comprehensive view of patient outcomes. Despite composite measures being a valuable tool to assess post-intervention outcomes, the patient ...
    • Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study
      Ayton, D.; Barker, A.; Peeters, G.; Berkovic, D.; Lefkovits, J.; Brennan, A.; Evans, S.; Zalcberg, J.; Reid, Christopher; Stoelwinder, J.; Mcneil, J. (2017)
      © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common cardiac procedure used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. Patient-centred care is a priority in cardiovascular ...
    • Improving care for people undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: elements of effective interventions
      Rolley, John Xavier (2009)
      Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are a frequent strategy for myocardial revascularisation in both the elective and emergency setting. In contrast to surgical techniques such as coronary artery bypass grafting ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.