Effects of different types of front-of-pack labelling information on the healthiness of food purchases—a randomised controlled trial
dc.contributor.author | Neal, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Crino, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunford, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Greenland, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ngai, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mhurchu, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pettigrew, Simone | |
dc.contributor.author | Sacks, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Webster, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-19T07:59:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-19T07:59:12Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-02-19T07:13:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Neal, B. and Crino, M. and Dunford, E. and Gao, A. and Greenland, R. and Li, N. and Ngai, J. et al. 2017. Effects of different types of front-of-pack labelling information on the healthiness of food purchases—a randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 9 (12): 1284. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65654 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/nu9121284 | |
dc.description.abstract |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Background: Front-of-pack nutrition labelling may support healthier packaged food purchases. Australia has adopted a novel Health Star Rating (HSR) system, but the legitimacy of this choice is unknown. Objective: To define the effects of different formats of front-of-pack labelling on the healthiness of food purchases and consumer perceptions. Design: Individuals were assigned at random to access one of four different formats of nutrition labelling—HSR, multiple traffic light labels (MTL), daily intake guides (DIG), recommendations/warnings (WARN)—or control (the nutrition information panel, NIP). Participants accessed nutrition information by using a smartphone application to scan the bar-codes of packaged foods, while shopping. The primary outcome was healthiness defined by the mean transformed nutrient profile score of packaged foods that were purchased over four weeks. Results: The 1578 participants, mean age 38 years, 84% female recorded purchases of 148,727 evaluable food items. The mean healthiness of the purchases in the HSR group was non-inferior to MTL, DIG, or WARN (all p < 0.001 at 2% non-inferiority margin). When compared to the NIP control, there was no difference in the mean healthiness of purchases for HSR, MTL, or DIG (all p > 0.07), but WARN resulted in healthier packaged food purchases (mean difference 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.72; p = 0.04). HSR was perceived by participants as more useful than DIG, and easier to understand than MTL or DIG (all p < 0.05). Participants also reported the HSR to be easier to understand, and the HSR and MTL to be more useful, than NIP (all p < 0.03). Conclusions: These real-world data align with experimental findings and provide support for the policy choice of HSR. Recommendation/warning labels warrant further exploration, as they may be a stronger driver of healthy food purchases. | |
dc.publisher | MDPI Publishing | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Effects of different types of front-of-pack labelling information on the healthiness of food purchases—a randomised controlled trial | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 9 | |
dcterms.source.number | 12 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 2072-6643 | |
dcterms.source.title | Nutrients | |
curtin.department | School of Psychology | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |