Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market
MetadataShow full item record
The placement of nutrition information on the front of food packages has been proposed as a method of providing simplified and visible nutrition information. This study aimed to determine the most acceptable and effective front-of-pack food labelling system for Australian consumers. Consumers' preferences and ability to compare the healthiness of mock food products were assessed for different front-of-pack labelling systems. Four systems were tested, including two variations of the Percentage Daily Intake system (Monochrome %DI and Colour-Coded %DI), which displays the proportion of daily nutrient contribution that a serve of food provides; and two variations of the Traffic Light (TL) system (Traffic Light and Traffic Light + Overall Rating), which uses colour-coding to indicate nutrient levels. Intercept surveys with 790 consumers were conducted, where each participant was exposed to a single labelling system for performance testing. Participants indicated strong support for the inclusion of nutrient information on total fat, saturated fat, sugar and sodium on the front of packages, and a consistent labelling format across all products. Using the TL system, participants were five times more likely to identify healthier foods compared with the Monochrome %DI system [odds ratio (OR) = 5.18; p < 0.001], and three times more likely compared with the Colour-Coded %DI system (OR = 3.01; p < 0.05). Consumers supported the introduction of consistent front-of-pack food labelling. The TL system was the most effective in assisting consumers to identify healthier foods. Mandatory TL labelling regulations are recommended to assist consumers in making healthy food choices.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Consumers' responses to health claims in the context of other on-pack nutrition information: A systematic reviewTalati, Zenobia; Pettigrew, S.; Neal, B.; Dixon, H.; Hughes, C.; Kelly, B.; Miller, C. (2017)© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. Context: The presence of health claims on food packaging can positively bias consumers' evaluations of ...
Pettigrew, Simone; Talati, Zenobia; Miller, C.; Dixon, H.; Kelly, B.; Ball, K. (2016)There is strong interest in front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) as a potential mechanism for improving diets, and therefore health, at the population level. The present study examined Australian consumers' preferences for different ...
The relative ability of different front-of-pack labels to assist consumers discriminate between healthy, moderately healthy, and unhealthy foodsTalati, Zenobia; Pettigrew, Simone; Ball, K.; Hughes, C.; Kelly, B.; Neal, B.; Dixon, H. (2017)The degree to which different front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) can assist consumers to make healthy choices seems to depend on the extent to which the FoPLs provide an interpretation of the nutrition information presented. ...