Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoward, J.
dc.contributor.authorGagné, Marylène
dc.contributor.authorMorin, A.
dc.contributor.authorVan den Broeck, A.
dc.identifier.citationHoward, J. and Gagné, M. and Morin, A. and Van den Broeck, A. 2016. Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 95-96: pp. 74-89.

Self-determination theory proposes that individuals experience distinct types of motivation to varying degrees. While it is well documented that these types of motivation differentially predict outcomes, very little attention has been paid to how they interact within individuals. The current study addresses the simultaneous occurrence of multiple motivation types within individual workers by adopting a person-centered approach on two samples of employees from different countries (n = 723 & 286). Four very similar motivation profiles were found across samples, representing balanced motivation, amotivated, autonomously regulated and highly motivated employees. In Sample 1, governmental employees presented a greater likelihood of membership in the least desirable amotivated profile. In Sample 2, autonomously and highly motivated profiles showed superior work performance and higher levels of wellbeing, while the amotivated profile fared the worst. The presence of external regulation in a profile appears unimportant when combined with autonomous forms of motivation, and detrimental to outcomes in the absence of autonomous forms of motivation. These results support the hypothesis that autonomous forms of motivation are far more important in promoting positive workplace outcomes than more controlling forms.

dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.titleMotivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Vocational Behavior
curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusOpen access

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record