Controversial Issues: Pro Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
dc.contributor.author | Dyson, Kate | |
dc.contributor.author | Stub, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bernard, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-08T04:41:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-08T04:41:17Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-08-08T03:50:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dyson, K. and Stub, D. and Bernard, S. and Smith, K. 2018. Controversial Issues: Pro Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Cardiology Clinics. 36 (3): pp. 367-374. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69533 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ccl.2018.03.004 | |
dc.description.abstract |
High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in particular chest compressions, is a key aspect of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. Manual chest compressions remain the standard of care; however, the extrication and transport of patients with OHCA undermine the quality of manual chest compressions and risk the safety of paramedics. Therefore, in circumstances whereby high-quality manual chest compressions are difficult or unsafe, paramedics should consider using a mechanical device. By combining high-quality manual chest compressions and judicious application of mechanical chest compressions, emergency medical service agencies can optimize paramedic safety and patient outcomes. | |
dc.title | Controversial Issues: Pro Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 36 | |
dcterms.source.number | 3 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 367 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 374 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0733-8651 | |
dcterms.source.title | Cardiology Clinics | |
curtin.department | School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |