Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGardiner, A.
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorGrand, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-13T09:12:27Z
dc.date.available2018-12-13T09:12:27Z
dc.date.created2018-12-12T02:47:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGardiner, A. and Sullivan, M. and Grand, A. 2018. Who Are You Writing for? Differences in Response to Blog Design Between Scientists and Nonscientists. Science Communication. 40 (1): pp. 109-123.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72142
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1075547017747608
dc.description.abstract

© 2018, © The Author(s) 2018. Science blogs have been advocated as potential mediators between science and nonscientist readers; however, they are mostly read by other scientists, with little research on how blogs can be made more appealing for nonscientists. We compared four possible treatments of a science blog post (text-only, humor, images and video). Nonscientists recalled more information when images were included compared to humor, while scientists performed worse with text-only than with video. Nonscientists enjoyed the images treatment most, while scientists preferred the video treatment. Adding images to blog posts is recommended as an easy method of increasing recall and enjoyment among readers.

dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.titleWho Are You Writing for? Differences in Response to Blog Design Between Scientists and Nonscientists
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume40
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage109
dcterms.source.endPage123
dcterms.source.issn1075-5470
dcterms.source.titleScience Communication
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record