Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPearce, Prafula
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Dale
dc.contributor.authorPope, J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-11T08:13:46Z
dc.date.available2019-07-11T08:13:46Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationPearce, P. and Pinto, D. and Pope, J. 2007. Salvaging lost pensions: who bears the risk?, in The Second All China Economics (ACE) International Conference, Dec 12-14 2007. Hong Kong.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/75989
dc.description.abstract

Old age security is an issue of universal concern. Evidence on China’s pension system is assessed as a Memorandum of Understanding was signed on 31 August 2007 between the OECD and the Chinese Ministry of Labour and Social Security to carry out research and policy analysis on private pensions in China. This paper examines the major failures of superannuation funds in the UK, Australia and USA that have affected thousands of retirees. It explores why superannuation funds fail, followed by an analysis of the superannuation legislation in the UK, Australia and the USA that deal with compensating the victims of failed funds. These systems are compared to an alternative system as used in Singapore. The paper explores lessons that can be learnt for China in setting up its private pension system.

dc.titleSalvaging lost pensions: who bears the risk?
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.conferenceThe all China economics international conference
dcterms.source.conference-start-date12 Dec 2007
dcterms.source.conferencelocationHong Kong
dc.date.updated2019-07-11T08:13:46Z
curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record