Risk Mitigation – What’s Your Score?
Citation
Crosby, P. 2018. Risk Mitigation – What’s Your Score? Engineering Technology Open Access Journal. 1 (1): pp. 1-2.
Source Title
Engineering Technology Open Access Journal
School
Curtin Graduate Research School
Collection
Abstract
This article examines conventional methods for risk identification and risk scoring using ‘look-up’ tables, and concludes that such methods are inherently flawed and offer false confidence in project management. The author suggests a series of searching questions to test the efficacy of traditional risk assessment in order to better prepare the project for review. Important further considerations are posed in relation to non-specific, irrational risk exposure (i.e. Black Swans), and the author presents two approaches for improved preparedness against undefined risk.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kendell, Michelle (2016)Study design: Cross sectional (Study 1) and prospective (Study 2). Background: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is problematic with significant personal, social, and economic impact. The need to screen for indicators of poor ...
-
Goh, Louise; Dhaliwal, Satvinder; Wellborn, T.; Thompson, P.; Maycock, Bruce; Kerr, Deborah; Lee, Andy; Bertolatti, Dean; Slivkoff-Clark, Karin; Naheed, R; Coorey, Ranil; Della, Phillip (2014)Purpose: Although elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are associated with a higher risk of developing heart conditions across all ethnic groups, variations exist between groups in the distribution and ...
-
Garratt-Reed, David (2012)Individuals with OCD avoid minor risks that are unrelated to their obsessive fears and this general risk-aversion is implicated in treatment failure and relapse. However, a lack of understanding of the cognitive biases ...