Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCronin, Sophie L.
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Belinda
dc.contributor.authorLipp, Ottmar
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-15T00:50:28Z
dc.date.available2020-05-15T00:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationCronin, S.L. and Craig, B.M. and Lipp, O.V. 2019. An own-age bias in mixed- and pure-list presentations: No evidence for the social-cognitive account. British Journal of Psychology.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79164
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjop.12435
dc.description.abstract

© 2019 The British Psychological Society The own-age bias (OAB) is suggested to be caused by perceptual-expertise and/or social-cognitive mechanisms. Bryce and Dodson (2013, Psychology and Aging, 28, 87, Exp 2) provided support for the social-cognitive account, demonstrating an OAB for participants who encountered a mixed-list of own- and other-age faces, but not for participants who encountered a pure-list of only own- or other-age faces. They proposed that own-age/other-age categorization, and the resulting OAB, only emerge when age is made salient in the mixed-list condition. Our study aimed to replicate this finding using methods typically used to investigate the OAB to examine their robustness and contribution to our understanding of how the OAB forms. Across three experiments that removed theoretically unimportant components of the original paradigm, varied face sex, and included background scenes, the OAB emerged under both mixed-list and pure-list conditions. These results are more consistent with a perceptual-expertise than social-cognitive account of the OAB, but may suggest that manipulating age salience using mixed-list and pure-list presentations is not sufficient to alter categorization processes.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150101540
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectPsychology, Multidisciplinary
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectface memory
dc.subjectface recognition
dc.subjectown-age bias
dc.subjectperceptual-expertise
dc.subjectsocial cognition
dc.subjectFACE RECOGNITION
dc.subjectRACE
dc.subjectCATEGORIZATION
dc.subjectMEMORY
dc.subjectINDIVIDUATION
dc.subjectEXPERIENCE
dc.subjectIDENTIFICATION
dc.subjectEXPRESSIONS
dc.subjectDATABASE
dc.subjectMODEL
dc.titleAn own-age bias in mixed- and pure-list presentations: No evidence for the social-cognitive account
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn0007-1269
dcterms.source.titleBritish Journal of Psychology
dc.date.updated2020-05-15T00:50:27Z
curtin.note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Cronin, S.L. and Craig, B.M. and Lipp, O.V. 2019. An own-age bias in mixed- and pure-list presentations: No evidence for the social-cognitive account. British Journal of Psychology, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12435. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidLipp, Ottmar [0000-0001-6734-8608]
curtin.contributor.orcidCraig, Belinda [0000-0001-7271-1459]
curtin.contributor.orcidCronin, Sophie L. [0000-0002-8608-5978]
curtin.contributor.researcheridLipp, Ottmar [A-1254-2007]
dcterms.source.eissn2044-8295
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridCraig, Belinda [55608428100]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridLipp, Ottmar [7004506548]


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record