Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valence

    79330.pdf (537.6Kb)
    Access Status
    Open access
    Authors
    Luck, Camilla
    Lipp, Ottmar
    Date
    2020
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Luck, C.C. and Lipp, O.V. 2020. Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valence. Cognition and Emotion. 34 (6): pp. 1210-1225.
    Source Title
    Cognition and Emotion
    DOI
    10.1080/02699931.2020.1736007
    Faculty
    Faculty of Health Sciences
    School
    School of Psychology
    Funding and Sponsorship
    http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP180100869 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015
    Remarks

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion on 10/03/20 available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736007

    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79228
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    During evaluative conditioning, a neutral conditional stimulus (CS) becomes pleasant or unpleasant after pairings with a positive/negative unconditional stimulus (US). Measures of US expectancy are commonly assessed during conditioning but it is unclear whether this affects evaluative learning. In Experiment 1, we examined whether the concurrent assessment of US expectancy alongside measures of CS valence would influence the acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement of explicit CS valence. Participants rated both valence and expectancy during conditioning (valence/expectancy group) or only CS valence (valence only group). Evaluative conditioning was acquired in both groups during acquisition, but its magnitude was enhanced in the valence/expectancy group. Measuring US expectancy did not influence the extinction or reinstatement of conditional valence. In Experiment 2, we confirmed the enhancement of evaluative conditioning due to concurrent measurement of US expectancy in an explicit measure, but did not find corresponding evidence in an implicit measure of conditional valence. In Experiment 3, we replicated the results using a different US expectancy scale and demonstrated that measuring CS valence multiple times throughout conditioning also strengthens conditional valence. Overall, the results suggest that the measurement of US expectancy and CS valence throughout conditioning draws attention to the contingencies and strengthens explicit evaluative learning.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations dissociate during backward fear conditioning
      Luck, C.; Lipp, Ottmar (2017)
      Blink startle magnitude is linearly modulated by affect such that, relative to neutral stimuli, startle magnitude is inhibited during pleasant stimuli and potentiated during unpleasant stimuli. Andreatta, Mühlberger, ...
    • Is the devil in the detail? Evidence for S-S learning after unconditional stimulus revaluation in human evaluative conditioning under a broader set of experimental conditions
      Jensen-Fielding, H.; Luck, Camilla; Lipp, Ottmar (2017)
      Whether valence change during evaluative conditioning is mediated by a link between the conditional stimulus (CS) and the unconditional stimulus (US; S-S learning) or between the CS and the unconditional response (S-R ...
    • To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects
      Luck, Camilla; Lipp, Ottmar (2015)
      Following differential fear conditioning, the instruction that the unconditional stimulus will no longer be presented (instructed extinction) reduces differential electrodermal responding to CS+ and CS-, but does not ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.