Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuck, Camilla
dc.contributor.authorLipp, Ottmar
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-15T02:44:44Z
dc.date.available2020-05-15T02:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationLuck, C.C. and Lipp, O.V. 2020. Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valence. Cognition and Emotion. 34 (6): pp. 1210-1225.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79228
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02699931.2020.1736007
dc.description.abstract

During evaluative conditioning, a neutral conditional stimulus (CS) becomes pleasant or unpleasant after pairings with a positive/negative unconditional stimulus (US). Measures of US expectancy are commonly assessed during conditioning but it is unclear whether this affects evaluative learning. In Experiment 1, we examined whether the concurrent assessment of US expectancy alongside measures of CS valence would influence the acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement of explicit CS valence. Participants rated both valence and expectancy during conditioning (valence/expectancy group) or only CS valence (valence only group). Evaluative conditioning was acquired in both groups during acquisition, but its magnitude was enhanced in the valence/expectancy group. Measuring US expectancy did not influence the extinction or reinstatement of conditional valence. In Experiment 2, we confirmed the enhancement of evaluative conditioning due to concurrent measurement of US expectancy in an explicit measure, but did not find corresponding evidence in an implicit measure of conditional valence. In Experiment 3, we replicated the results using a different US expectancy scale and demonstrated that measuring CS valence multiple times throughout conditioning also strengthens conditional valence. Overall, the results suggest that the measurement of US expectancy and CS valence throughout conditioning draws attention to the contingencies and strengthens explicit evaluative learning.

dc.description.sponsorship
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP180100869 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectPsychology, Experimental
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectEvaluative conditioning
dc.subjectvalence
dc.subjectUS expectancy measures
dc.subjectreinstatement
dc.subjectCS valence measures
dc.subjectFEAR
dc.subjectEXTINCTION
dc.subjectAWARENESS
dc.subjectIMPLICIT
dc.subjectDISLIKES
dc.subjectRETURN
dc.subjectLIKES
dc.titleMeasuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valence
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleCognition and Emotion
dc.date.updated2020-05-15T02:44:43Z
curtin.note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion on 10/03/20 available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736007

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidLipp, Ottmar [0000-0001-6734-8608]
curtin.contributor.orcidLuck, Camilla [0000-0002-9364-1418]
curtin.contributor.researcheridLipp, Ottmar [A-1254-2007]
dcterms.source.eissn1464-0600
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridLipp, Ottmar [7004506548]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridLuck, Camilla [56498797100]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record