Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFlatau-Harrison, H.
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Mark
dc.contributor.authorGagne, Marylene
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T05:21:03Z
dc.date.available2020-08-07T05:21:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFlatau-Harrison, H. and Griffin, M.A. and Gagne, M. 2020. Should We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation. Journal of Business and Psychology.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80472
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10869-020-09696-2
dc.description.abstract

© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Organisational research investigating climate perceptions often use constructs reflecting dispersion and disagreement, termed ‘climate strength’, to investigate situational pressures on behaviour expression. Within safety-specific contexts, research has tended to emphasise the prediction of climate strength rather than an examination of its effects on behaviour. The present paper investigates the important first pathway in the prediction of safety behaviour by investigating the influence of safety climate strength on the relationship between safety climate perceptions and individual safety motivation in a safety critical context using multilevel analyses. Contrary to expectations, results initially indicated that safety climate strength negatively influenced the relationship between safety climate perceptions and safety motivation, such that greater variability was associated with greater motivation. Post hoc analysis re-grouping responses into broader functional levels found support for an interaction, suggesting a difference in the scope of influence for safety climate strength between the two levels of analysis. These findings are discussed in light of self-determination theory, and suggestions for future research and practice made.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectBusiness
dc.subjectPsychology, Applied
dc.subjectBusiness & Economics
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectSafety motivation
dc.subjectSafety climate strength
dc.subjectSafety climate
dc.subjectMultilevel moderation
dc.subjectSelf-determination theory
dc.subjectSELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL-CLIMATE
dc.subjectCROSS-LEVEL
dc.subjectTRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
dc.subjectSITUATIONAL STRENGTH
dc.subjectINTRINSIC MOTIVATION
dc.subjectANTECEDENTS
dc.subjectWORK
dc.subjectCITIZENSHIP
dc.subjectBEHAVIOR
dc.titleShould We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn0889-3268
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Business and Psychology
dc.date.updated2020-08-07T05:21:02Z
curtin.departmentFuture of Work Institute
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law
curtin.contributor.orcidGriffin, Mark [0000-0003-4326-7752]
curtin.contributor.orcidGagne, Marylene [0000-0003-3248-8947]
curtin.contributor.researcheridGriffin, Mark [C-2440-2013] [H-9312-2014]
curtin.contributor.researcheridGagne, Marylene [H-4957-2013]
dcterms.source.eissn1573-353X
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridGriffin, Mark [7403310336]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridGagne, Marylene [7102489016]
dc.date.embargoEnd2021-06-05


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record