Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoque, Najmul
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, Wahidul
dc.contributor.authorMazhar, Ilyas
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Ian
dc.contributor.editorRoy, Poritosh
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-14T09:37:14Z
dc.date.available2020-08-14T09:37:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHoque, N. and Biswas, W. and Mazhar, I. and Howard, I. 2020. Life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative energy sources for the Western Australian transport sector. Sustainability. 12 (14): Article No. 5565.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80563
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12145565
dc.description.abstract

Environmental obligation, fuel security, and human health issues have fuelled the search for locally produced sustainable transport fuels as an alternative to liquid petroleum. This study evaluates the sustainability performance of various alternative energy sources, namely, ethanol, electricity, electricity-gasoline hybrid, and hydrogen, for Western Australian road transport using a life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework. The framework employs 11 triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability indicators and uses threshold values for benchmarking sustainability practices. A number of improvement strategies were devised based on the hotspots once the alternative energy sources failed to meet the sustainability threshold for the determined indicators. The proposed framework effectively addresses the issue of interdependencies between the three pillars of sustainability, which was an inherent weakness of previous frameworks. The results show that the environment-friendly and socially sustainable energy options, namely, ethanol-gasoline blend E55, electricity, electricity-E10 hybrid, and hydrogen, would need around 0.02, 0.14, 0.10, and 0.71 AUD/VKT of financial support, respectively, to be comparable to gasoline. Among the four assessed options, hydrogen shows the best performance for the environmental and social bottom line when renewable electricity is employed for hydrogen production. The economic sustainability of hydrogen fuel is, however, uncertain at this stage due to the high cost of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs). The robustness of the proposed framework warrants its application in a wide range of alternative fuel assessment scenarios locally as well as globally.

dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject0907 - Environmental Engineering
dc.subject0913 - Mechanical Engineering
dc.subject0502 - Environmental Science and Management
dc.titleLife cycle sustainability assessment of alternative energy sources for the Western Australian transport sector
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume12
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage32
dcterms.source.issn2071-1050
dcterms.source.titleSustainability
dc.date.updated2020-08-14T09:37:14Z
curtin.note

© 2020 The Authors. Published by MDPI Publishing.

curtin.departmentSchool of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.contributor.orcidBiswas, Wahidul [0000-0002-6116-8881] [0000-0002-6891-9668]
curtin.contributor.orcidHoward, Ian [0000-0003-3999-9184]
curtin.contributor.researcheridBiswas, Wahidul [J-5723-2016]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridBiswas, Wahidul [6602349968]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridHoward, Ian [12808325800]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/