Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpahn, D.
dc.contributor.authorShander, A.
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Axel
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:05:51Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:05:51Z
dc.date.created2013-04-17T20:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSpahn, Donat and Shander, Aryeh and Hofmann, Axel. 2013. The chiasm: Transfusion practice versus patient blood management. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 27 (1): pp. 37-42.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8308
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bpa.2013.02.003
dc.description.abstract

In recent years it became increasingly clear that allogeneic redblood cell (RBC) transfusions result in increased mortality andmajor adverse clinical outcomes. The major risk factors for RBCtransfusions are preoperative anaemia, high perioperative bloodloss and liberal transfusion triggers. Patient blood management(PBM), the bundle of preoperative anaemia treatment, measures toreduce perioperative blood loss and optimising anaemia tolerance,aims at minimising RBC transfusion needs and improving clinicaloutcomes. PBM has been adopted by the World Health Organizationas the new standard of care and all member states are urgedto implement this concept. Australia is leading the world in thatPBM is indeed implemented at the current time.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectcordially
dc.subjectmonitoring
dc.subjectallogeneic red blood cell transfusion
dc.subjectmortality
dc.subjectoutcome
dc.subjectpatient blood management
dc.titleThe chiasm: Transfusion practice versus patient blood management
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume27
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage37
dcterms.source.endPage42
dcterms.source.issn1521-6896
dcterms.source.titleBest Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record