A new Inequity-in-Health Index based on Millenium Development Goals: methodology and validation
dc.contributor.author | Eslava-Schmalbach, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alfonso, Helman | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveros, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gaitán, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Agudelo, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T11:07:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T11:07:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-09-12T08:36:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Eslava-Schmalbach, J. and Alfonso, H. and Oliveros, H. and Gaitán, H. and Agudelo, C. 2008. A new Inequity-in-Health Index based on Millenium Development Goals: methodology and validation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 61 (2): pp. 142-150. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8543 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.001 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Objectives: Developing a new Inequity-in-Health Index (IHI) assuming inequity as "inequality of health outcomes," based on Millennium Development Goals (MDG). Study Design and Setting: Ecological study. Countries from around the world were included from United Nations, the World Bank, and a nonprofit organization's databases. The reliability and validity of this bidimensional IHI was tested. Main factor analysis (promax rotation) and main component analysis were used. Results: Six variables were used for constructing the IHI was constructed with six variables: underweight children, child mortality, death from malaria in children aged 0-4, death from malaria at all ages, births attended by skilled health personnel, and immunization against measles. The IHI had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.8504), was reliable (Spearman > 0.9, P = 0.0000), and had 0.3033p around the world (range: 0p-0.5984p). IHI had high correlation with the human development and poverty indexes, health gap indicator, life expectancy at birth, probability of dying before 40 years of age, and Gini coefficients (Spearman > 0.7, P = 0.0000). IHI discriminated countries by income, region, indebtedness, and corruption level (Kruskal Wallis, P < 0.01). IHI had sensitivity to change (P = 0.0000). Conclusion: IHI is a bidimensional, valid and reliable index to monitor MDG. A new reliable methodology for developing bidimensional indicators is shown, which could be used for constructing other ones with their corresponding scores and graphs. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.title | A new Inequity-in-Health Index based on Millenium Development Goals: methodology and validation | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 61 | |
dcterms.source.number | 2 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 142 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 150 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0895-4356 | |
dcterms.source.title | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | |
curtin.department | Epidemiology and Biostatistics | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |