Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, James
dc.contributor.authorvan der Groen, Onno
dc.contributor.authorLearmonth, Yvonne
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-10T04:59:50Z
dc.date.available2023-06-10T04:59:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSmith, J. and van der Groen, O. and Learmonth, Y. 2023. Feasibility Meets Implementation Science: Narrowing the Research-To-Practice Gap for Exercise Activity in Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 22.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92361
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1609406923118016
dc.description.abstract

Background: There is a need to identify why multiple sclerosis exercise research is not translating into real-world participation. To lay the foundations of strong clinical research, considering the translational element of implementation science at the feasibility phase of a trial is vital. Methods: Document analysis was used to examine document sources on exercise activity interventions designed for people living with multiple sclerosis. Document sources focused on multiple sclerosis research that incorporated exercise pre scription elements and behaviour change and were feasibility studies incorporating aspects of implementation science. Results: Implementation science should come much earlier than the efficacy or effectiveness research pipeline. An alternate view is outlined where feasibility and implementation science should meet based on case examples that have not yet shown strong efficacy or effectiveness. Findings from our key themes indicate a need for a cyclical iterative approach to the translational process. Multiple aspects of feasibility and how it can be assessed using an implementation science lens to support more successful interventions are provided. The determination of feasibility in behaviour change should involve implementation science as feasibility is drawn on for theory development, optimising the intervention design and quality of implementation strategies, and identifying those delivering the intervention before conducting efficacy and effectiveness research. Conclusions: Document analysis methodology is underused in qualitative research and was appropriate to use as it was a very resource, time-efficient and an unobtrusive process that could track change and development to explore the integration of implementation science at the feasibility phase, with the findings indicating the earlier implementation science is introduced into multiple sclerosis exercise interventions the better.

dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleFeasibility Meets Implementation Science: Narrowing the Research-To-Practice Gap for Exercise Activity in Multiple Sclerosis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume22
dcterms.source.issn1609-4069
dcterms.source.titleInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods
dc.date.updated2023-06-10T04:59:49Z
curtin.departmentCurtin School of Population Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidSmith, James [0000-0002-0448-8774]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridSmith, James [57208384930]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/