Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPreece, David
dc.contributor.authorBecerra, R.
dc.contributor.authorHasking, Penelope
dc.contributor.authorMcEvoy, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBoyes, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSauer-Zavala, S.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wai
dc.contributor.authorGross, J.J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-13T00:25:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-13T00:25:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPreece, D.A. and Becerra, R. and Hasking, P. and McEvoy, P.M. and Boyes, M. and Sauer-Zavala, S. and Chen, W. et al. 2021. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Relations with Affective Symptoms in a United States General Community Sample. Journal of Affective Disorders. 284: pp. 27-30.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93747
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.071
dc.description.abstract

Background: Difficulties in emotion regulation are a key risk factor for affective disorders. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) is a 10-item measure of two emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. It is widely used tool in the United States, however, most psychometric studies of the ERQ have so far been conducted with college students and some researchers have recently questioned its factorial validity in non-student samples. In this study, we conducted the first confirmatory factor analysis study of the ERQ in a United States general community sample. Method: We examined the ERQ's factor structure, measurement invariance across age, education and gender categories, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity with a sample of 508 adults. Results: The intended two-factor model (cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression) was an excellent fit to the data, and this structure was invariant across different age, education, and gender categories. Both ERQ scale scores had good omega and alpha reliabilities, and correlated as expected with depression and anxiety symptoms. Cognitive reappraisal was negatively correlated with these symptoms, whereas expressive suppression was positively correlated with these symptoms. Limitations: We did not include a clinical sample and future psychometric studies of the ERQ in specialised clinical populations would be useful. Conclusions: The ERQ appears to have strong psychometric properties when used with general community members from the United States. ERQ scores can be confidently used and compared across adults of different ages, genders, and educational backgrounds.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectClinical Neurology
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectNeurosciences & Neurology
dc.subjectEmotion Regulation Questionnaire
dc.subjectFactor structure
dc.subjectPsychometric
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectGeneral community
dc.subjectEmotion Regulation Questionnaire
dc.subjectFactor structure
dc.subjectGeneral community
dc.subjectPsychometric
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAffective Symptoms
dc.subjectEmotional Regulation
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectAffective Symptoms
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectEmotional Regulation
dc.titleThe Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Relations with Affective Symptoms in a United States General Community Sample
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume284
dcterms.source.startPage27
dcterms.source.endPage30
dcterms.source.issn0165-0327
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Affective Disorders
dc.date.updated2023-11-13T00:25:48Z
curtin.departmentCurtin School of Population Health
curtin.departmentCurtin Medical School
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidPreece, David [0000-0003-1060-2024]
curtin.contributor.orcidHasking, Penelope [0000-0002-0172-9288]
curtin.contributor.orcidMcEvoy, Peter [0000-0003-2924-6760]
curtin.contributor.orcidBoyes, Mark [0000-0001-5420-8606]
curtin.contributor.orcidChen, Wai [0000-0002-0477-7883]
curtin.contributor.researcheridBoyes, Mark [G-9680-2014]
dcterms.source.eissn1573-2517
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridHasking, Penelope [55924025500]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridMcEvoy, Peter [16402882900] [57928345400]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridBoyes, Mark [26537153900]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/