Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBentley, Brenda
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Moira
dc.contributor.authorKane, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Lauren
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:58:15Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:58:15Z
dc.date.created2014-09-07T20:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationBentley, B. and O'Connor, M. and Kane, R. and Breen, L. 2014. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Dignity Therapy for People with Motor Neurone Disease. PLoS ONE. 9 (5): e96888.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16858
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0096888
dc.description.abstract

Background: Motor neurone disease (MND) practice guidelines suggest developing interventions that will promote hope, meaning, and dignity to alleviate psychological distress, but very little research has been done. This study begins to address this need by exploring the use of dignity therapy with people with MND. Dignity therapy is a brief psychotherapy that promotes hope, meaning and dignity, and enhances the end of life for people with advanced cancer. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of dignity therapy for people with MND. Methods/design: This cross-sectional feasibility study used a one-group pre-test post-test design with 29 people diagnosed with MND. Study participants completed the following self-report questionnaires: Herth Hope Index, FACIT-sp, Patient Dignity Inventory, ALS Assessment Questionnaire, ALS Cognitive Behavioural Screen, and a demographic and health history questionnaire. Acceptability was measured with a 25-item feedback questionnaire. Feasibility was assessed by examining the length of time taken to complete dignity therapy and how symptoms common in MND affected the intervention. Generalised linear mixed models and reliable change scores were used to analyse the data.Results: There were no significant pre-test post-test changes for hopefulness, spirituality or dignity on the group level, but there were changes in hopefulness on the individual level. The results of the feedback questionnaire indicates dignity therapy is highly acceptable to people with MND, who report benefits similar to those in the international randomised controlled trial on dignity therapy, a population who primarily had end-stage cancer. Benefits include better family relationships, improved sense of self and greater acceptance. Dignity therapy with people with MND is feasible if the therapist can overcome time and communication difficulties. Conclusions: Dignity therapy for people with MND is feasible and acceptable. Further research is warranted to explore its ability to diminish distress.

dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.titleFeasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Dignity Therapy for People with Motor Neurone Disease
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume9
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.issn1932-6203
dcterms.source.titlePLoS ONE
curtin.note

This article is published under the Open Access publishing model and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Please refer to the licence to obtain terms for any further reuse or distribution of this work.

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record