Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchultz, A.
dc.contributor.authorLe Souëf, T.
dc.contributor.authorVenter, A.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Guicheng
dc.contributor.authorDevadason, S.
dc.contributor.authorLe Souëf, P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:43:30Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:43:30Z
dc.date.created2016-09-12T08:36:29Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationSchultz, A. and Le Souëf, T. and Venter, A. and Zhang, G. and Devadason, S. and Le Souëf, P. 2010. Aerosol inhalation from spacers and valved holding chambers requires few tidal breaths for children. Pediatrics. 126 (6): pp. e1493-e1498.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24524
dc.identifier.doi10.1542/peds.2010-1377
dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the number of breaths required to inhale salbutamol from different spacers/valved holding chambers (VHCs). METHODS: Breathing patterns were recorded for 2- to 7-year-old children inhaling placebo from 4 different spacers/VHCs and were simulated by a flow generator. Drug delivery with different numbers of tidal breaths and with a single maximal breath was compared. RESULTS: With tidal breathing, mean inhalation volumes were large, ranging from 384 mL to 445 mL. Mean values for drug delivery with an Aerochamber Plus (Trudell, London, Canada) were 40% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34%-46%) and 41% (95% CI: 36%-47%) of the total dose with 2 and 9 tidal breaths, respectively. Mean drug delivery values with these breath numbers with a Funhaler (Visiomed, Perth, Australia) were 39% (95% CI: 34%-43%) and 38% (95% CI: 35%-42%), respectively. With a Volumatic (GlaxoSmithKline, Melbourne, Australia), mean drug delivery values with 2 and 9 tidal breaths were 37% (95% CI: 33%-41%) and 43% (95% CI: 40%-46%), respectively (P = .02); there was no significant difference in drug delivery with 3 versus 9 tidal breaths. With the modified soft drink bottle, drug delivery. Drug delivery was not improved with a single maximal breath with any device. CONCLUSION: For young children, tidal breaths through a spacer/VHC were much larger than expected. Two tidal breaths were adequate for small-volume VHCs and a 500-mL modified soft drink bottle, and 3 tidal breaths were adequate for the larger Volumatic VHC. Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Pediatrics
dc.titleAerosol inhalation from spacers and valved holding chambers requires few tidal breaths for children
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume126
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPagee1493
dcterms.source.endPagee1498
dcterms.source.issn0031-4005
dcterms.source.titlePediatrics
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record