The Malaise of Federalism: comparative reflections on Commonwealth-State relations
Access Status
Authors
Date
2007Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
The High Court's decision in the ‘Work Choices’ case expanding further the scope of the Commonwealth's enumerated powers is the latest reminder of the highly centralised nature of Australian federalism. The division of powers traditionally forming the essence of a federal system has become increasingly difficult to discern and the roles and responsibilities of the two levels of government have become entangled. While for a good part of Australia's history divided jurisdiction was deplored as an obstacle to progress in government, today the decay of the system is most likely to be lamented. Discussion of options for reform presupposes an understanding of the forces that have led to the present condition. This article examines the Australian experience in a broader comparative and historical perspective and suggests that those forces are endemic and substantial.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fenna, Alan (2012)Federalism is a distinct governmental form with its own particular impact on public administration and policy and programme coordination between governments. In particular, it is a system where intergovernmental relations ...
-
Petchey, Jeffrey Dean; Wells, G. (2004)In 1901, the former colonies of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia and South Australia federated to create the nation of Australia under the auspices of a new constitution. Within the ...
-
Evans, Michelle (2012)Australia’s federal system of government is established by the structure of the Constitution which provides for a central federal government and six state governments. When the Constitution was originally drafted, the ...