Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFenna, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:02:25Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:02:25Z
dc.date.created2014-10-08T06:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationFenna, A. 2007. The Malaise of Federalism: comparative reflections on Commonwealth-State relations. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 66 (3): pp. 298-306.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27994
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00551.x
dc.description.abstract

The High Court's decision in the ‘Work Choices’ case expanding further the scope of the Commonwealth's enumerated powers is the latest reminder of the highly centralised nature of Australian federalism. The division of powers traditionally forming the essence of a federal system has become increasingly difficult to discern and the roles and responsibilities of the two levels of government have become entangled. While for a good part of Australia's history divided jurisdiction was deplored as an obstacle to progress in government, today the decay of the system is most likely to be lamented. Discussion of options for reform presupposes an understanding of the forces that have led to the present condition. This article examines the Australian experience in a broader comparative and historical perspective and suggests that those forces are endemic and substantial.

dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia P/L
dc.subjectglobal trends in federalism
dc.subjectcentralisation
dc.subjectfederalism
dc.titleThe Malaise of Federalism: comparative reflections on Commonwealth-State relations
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume66
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage298
dcterms.source.endPage306
dcterms.source.issn0313-6647
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Journal of Public Administration
curtin.departmentJohn Curtin Institute of Public Policy (Research Institute)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record