Label reading nutrient criteria: A survey of Australian nutrition professionals
MetadataShow full item record
Aim: The aims of the present study were (i) to identify the format of resources that nutrition professionals use to educate consumers about reading nutrition information panels; (ii) to identify the most common nutrient criteria; and (iii) to assess the suitability of the nutrient criteria by assessing them against foods commonly eaten in Australia, from products in NUTTAB 2006. Methods: An online 13-question survey, asking about resources and nutrient criteria used, was distributed by email by the Dietitians Association of Australia. A total of 240 surveys were completed. The most common nutrient criteria were identified and tested against common foods in the NUTTAB 2006 database to make an assessment on suitability. Results: The most common resource format was diet sheet, and the most common criterion for each nutrient was: energy <600 kJ/snack food, total fat <10 g/100 g, saturated fat <3 g/100 g, sugar <10 g/100 g, fibre >3 g/serve and sodium <120 mg/100 g. One-third of common foods in Australia met all four of the ‘per 100 g’ nutrient criteria. Conclusions: The majority of respondents had a set of nutrient criteria for educating consumers about reading and understanding nutrition information panels. The most common nutrient criteria allowed sufficient number of foods to choose from, suggesting that the four most common ‘per 100 g’ nutrient criteria are suitable for use with consumers.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Pettigrew, Simone; Talati, Zenobia; Miller, C.; Dixon, H.; Kelly, B.; Ball, K. (2016)There is strong interest in front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) as a potential mechanism for improving diets, and therefore health, at the population level. The present study examined Australian consumers' preferences for different ...
Inoue, Madoka; Binns, Colin (2014)For infants’ optimal growth and development, the introduction of nutritionally suitable solid foods at the appropriate time is essential. However, less attention has been paid to this stage of infant life when compared ...
The combined effect of front-of-pack nutrition labels and health claims on consumers’ evaluation of food productsTalati, Zenobia; Pettigrew, Simone; Hughes, C.; Dixon, H.; Kelly, B.; Ball, K.; Miller, C. (2016)The majority of studies examining the effect of nutrition information on food packets (such as the nutrition information panel (NIP), front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) and health claims) have examined each in isolation, even ...