Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPoh, P.F.
dc.contributor.authorSng, Q.W.
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos
dc.contributor.authorHe, L.
dc.contributor.authorFong, M.F.
dc.contributor.authorMuralidharah, J.
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Q.
dc.contributor.authorMatsuishi, Y.
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-26T06:25:31Z
dc.date.available2023-12-26T06:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPoh, P.F. and Sng, Q.W. and Latour, J.M. and He, L. and Fong, M.F. and Muralidharah, J. and Abbas, Q. et al. 2022. Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 23 (11): pp. E498-E506.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/94029
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PCC.0000000000003023
dc.description.abstract

Objectives: To identify nursing research priorities in pediatric critical care in Asia. Design: We conducted a modified three-round eDelphi survey with pediatric critical care nurses in Asia. The eDelphi technique has been extensively used within health research to achieve a common viewpoint from experts using questionnaires to gather research priorities. In round 1, participants were asked to list three to five research topics that they deemed important. These topics were thematically analyzed and categorized into a questionnaire. Participants rated the research topics in round 2 on a 6-point scale (1 = not important to 6 = extremely important). In round 3, the same questionnaire was used with addition of the calculated mean scores from round 2 for each topic. Research topics ranked among the top 10 were considered extremely important. Settings: Twenty-two PICUs in eight Asian countries. SUBJECTS: Clinical nurses, managers, educators, and researchers. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: In round 1, 146 PICU nurses across eight countries provided 520 research topics. Topics from round 1 were categorized into seven domains with 52 research topics. Prioritized research topics included early recognition of patient deterioration (mean 5.58 ± 0.61), prevention of healthcare-associated infections (mean 5.47 ± 0.70), and interventions to reduce compassion fatigue (mean 5.45 ± 0.80). The top three research domains were end-of-life care (mean 5.34 ± 0.68), professionalism (mean 5.34 ± 0.69), and management of pain, sedation, and delirium (5.32 ± 0.72). Conclusions: This first PICU nursing research prioritization exercise within Asia identified key nursing research themes that should be prioritized and provide a framework for future collaborative studies.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectCritical Care Medicine
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.subjectAsia nursing
dc.subjectresearch
dc.subjectchildren intensive care
dc.subjectDelphi technique
dc.subjectevidence-based nursing
dc.subjectresearch prioritization exercise
dc.subjectPALLIATIVE CARE
dc.subjectDELPHI
dc.subjectNURSES
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY
dc.subjectCOUNTRIES
dc.subjectDECISION
dc.subjectINCOME
dc.subjectPICU
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectCritical Care Medicine
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.subjectAsia nursing
dc.subjectresearch
dc.subjectchildren intensive care
dc.subjectDelphi technique
dc.subjectevidence-based nursing
dc.subjectresearch prioritization exercise
dc.subjectPALLIATIVE CARE
dc.subjectDELPHI
dc.subjectNURSES
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY
dc.subjectCOUNTRIES
dc.subjectDECISION
dc.subjectINCOME
dc.subjectPICU
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectCritical Care Nursing
dc.subjectDelphi Technique
dc.subjectNursing Research
dc.subjectAsia
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectPediatric Acute & Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN)
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNursing Research
dc.subjectDelphi Technique
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectAsia
dc.subjectCritical Care Nursing
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.titlePediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume23
dcterms.source.number11
dcterms.source.startPageE498
dcterms.source.endPageE506
dcterms.source.issn1529-7535
dcterms.source.titlePediatric Critical Care Medicine
dc.date.updated2023-12-26T06:25:29Z
curtin.note

This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Poh, Pei-Fen RN, MSc; Sng, Qian Wen RN, BSc (Hons); Latour, Jos M. RN, PhD; He, Linxi RN, MSc; Fong, Mei Fung RN, BSc (Hons); Muralidharah, Jayashree MD, FCCM, FICCM, FIAP; Abbas, Qalab MBBS; Matsuishi, Yujiro RN, PhD; Lee, Jan Hau MBBS, MRCPCH, MCI;  on behalf of Pediatric Acute & Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN). Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 23(11):p e498-e506, November 2022. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003023.

curtin.departmentCurtin School of Nursing
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidLatour, Jos [0000-0001-9677-8340] [0000-0002-8087-6461]
curtin.contributor.researcheridLatour, Jos [ABE-9521-2020]
dcterms.source.eissn1947-3893
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridLatour, Jos [23019310400] [57218590755]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record